MABFAN's Musings - [IRTF] The Order of the Stories: A Question

09:00 am March 13th, 2008




			MABFAN's Musings - [IRTF] The Order of the Stories: A Question The Blog of Science Fiction Writer Michael A. Burstein

mabfan


	[IRTF] The Order of the Stories: A Question
	So, as most of you are probably already aware, Apex Books will be publishing my short story collection I Remember the Future: The Award-Nominated Stories of Michael A. Burstein in September. The cover has already been put together; my new user icon is a miniature version of the cover, which I'll probably try to use for book-related posts. Pretty soon, we're going to have an announcement about pre-ordering the book, including a special possibility for people who pre-order the autographed hardcover edition. In the meantime, though, I've been thinking about some of the mechanics of the book, and I thought I'd throw out my question to the world and see if anyone wanted to share their thoughts. The book will consist of 15 stories, thirteen previously published ones and two new ones. Here's the list, in chronological order: 1. "TeleAbsence" (Analog, July 1995) 2. "Broken Symmetry" (Analog, February 1997) 3. "Cosmic Corkscrew" (Analog, June 1998) 4. "Absent Friends" (Analog, September 1998) 5. "Reality Check" (Analog, November 1999) 6. "Kaddish for the Last Survivor" (Analog, November 2000) 7. "Spaceships" (Analog, June 2001) 8. "Paying It Forward" (Analog, September 2003) 9. "Decisions" (Analog, January/February 2004) 10. "Time Ablaze" (Analog, June 2004) 11. "Seventy-Five Years" (Analog, January/February 2005) 12. "TelePresence" (Analog, July/August 2005) 13. "Sanctuary" (Analog, September 2005) 14. Empty Spaces (original to the book) 15. I Remember the Future (original to the book) Now here's the question. How should I order the stories? One school of thought suggests that I should set the Table of Contents to be chronological. That way, people reading the book from beginning to end could track my growth (or possible lack thereof) as a writer. But another school of thought suggests grouping the stories more thematically. For example, "Empty Spaces" is the fourth story in the "Broken Symmetry" series, and it might make sense to place it directly after "Absent Friends" and "Reality Check" (and to move "Cosmic Corkscrew"). And how should I open and end the book? I could bookend the collection with "TeleAbsence" and "TelePresence," since they are a story and a sequel that represent my first ten years in Analog. Or I could open the book with "Kaddish for the Last Survivor" and close with "Paying It Forward," which seem to be my most popular stories. At the moment, I'm leaning towards keeping the chronological order, especially since I'm writing an original Afterword for each story. But the thematic grouping calls to me as well. Tags: books, i remember the future, personal, science-fiction

25 comments or post comment


	Comments

From: elul_3	Date: March 13th, 2008 01:37 pm (UTC)		(link)

I vote for thematic grouping, provided that you provide original publication date (year) for each story, either in the table of contents or on the first page of each story or both. Or with the Afterword for each story. Whatever. Somewhere.

(Reply) (Thread)

From: magid	Date: March 13th, 2008 01:53 pm (UTC)		(link)

Just what I was thinking! If you include the dates, those drawn to chronology can read them in publication order fairly easily, while it is much more difficult to do a thematic grouping before reading the stories.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

	From: introverte	Date: March 13th, 2008 03:55 pm (UTC)		(link)

I like this too

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

	From: cadhla	Date: March 13th, 2008 02:18 pm (UTC)		(link)

I like the Stephen King method -- assign each one a number, and start picking cards. Since you have fifteen stories, maybe pick them out of a hat. Entropy forever!

(Reply) (Thread)

	From: shsilver	Date: March 13th, 2008 02:44 pm (UTC)		(link)

Alphabetical order by publication date.

Will you be including author's intros to each story?

(Reply) (Thread)

	From: mabfan	Date: March 13th, 2008 03:25 pm (UTC)		(link)

I'll be doing afterwords instead of intros. I'd rather people approach the book by reading each story first before reading my comments on it.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

	From: lisafeld	Date: March 13th, 2008 03:11 pm (UTC)		(link)

FWIW, I vote for thematic and opening and closing with "Kaddish" and "Paying it Forward". The original publication dates can easily be listed in the TOC or on the rights page, but having read a ton of anthologies at this point, I think you want to open strong, close strong, and give people a sense of continuity between linked stories, so they don't have to keep shifting gears as they read.

This is all so exciting!

(Reply) (Thread)

	From: mabfan	Date: March 13th, 2008 03:28 pm (UTC)		(link)

If I close with both "Kaddish" and "Paying It Forward," with what story or stories would you suggest I open the book?

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

	From: lisafeld	Date: March 13th, 2008 03:46 pm (UTC)		(link)

I'd start with TeleAbsence & TelePresence. I think that would kick things off beautifully.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

	From: sethg_prime	Date: March 13th, 2008 05:09 pm (UTC)		(link)

I agree with "open strong" and "close strong".

Note that you can have continuity between linked stories without actually dividing the book into thematic sections. (Look at what the Talmud does... :-)

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

	From: jimvanpelt	Date: March 13th, 2008 04:08 pm (UTC)		(link)

Not chronological. I think very few readers are interested (or even aware) of the concept of a writer's growth. They assume we were born shiny *g*.

I did one collection thematically, even naming the themes in the table of contents, and the other I was more concerned about pacing and style. I didn't want two similarly styled stories back to back. We moved one story because the opening line mirrored too closely the opening line of the story before it. We didn't want two first person narratives back to back. We didn't want two depressing stories back to back. So, we went for the story we thought was the most instantly grabbing as the lead off and a story that seemed to say "the end" as the conclusion.

But whoever posted above about picking from a hat might give you just as good of an order. Good luck with the book.

(Reply) (Thread)

	From: jenwrites	Date: March 13th, 2008 05:22 pm (UTC)		(link)

Not chronological. I think very few readers are interested (or even aware) of the concept of a writer's growth. They assume we were born shiny *g*.

Actually, I've had at least one review of my collection (which is ordered chronologically) state that they could watch my skills improve over the course of the book.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

	From: mabfan	Date: March 13th, 2008 05:29 pm (UTC)		(link)

That might be a good reason for me to avoid a chronological order... :-)

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

	From: jenwrites	Date: March 13th, 2008 05:34 pm (UTC)		(link)

LOL! You may have a point there. But then again, there's something nice about having someone reach the end of a book and feel like each story was better than the one before it.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

	From: jimvanpelt	Date: March 13th, 2008 07:21 pm (UTC)		(link)

I had a reviewer once point out that my stories had improved over time based on their publication date chronology, but the stories were not written in that order. The one she said showed the most maturity (clearly learned by writing the previous ones) was a story that I'd written very early in my career. It just hadn't sold for a while.

Surely a writer grows as he continues to write, but sometimes that growth looks like a step back from the outside.

I think your idea of grouping stories that take place in the same worlds or have those kinds of textual links is a good one.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

	From: jenwrites	Date: March 13th, 2008 05:21 pm (UTC)		(link)

One school of thought suggests that I should set the Table of Contents to be chronological. That way, people reading the book from beginning to end could track my growth (or possible lack thereof) as a writer.

That's what I did myself, but I didn't have thematic groups that I could use since none of my stories take place in the same universe. So I'm of no use to you ;)

(Reply) (Thread)

	From: mabfan	Date: March 13th, 2008 05:28 pm (UTC)		(link)

Nomi tends to think that the theme of almost all my stories is the same one: how the future will remember us. So that would mean that they could all go together in one theme.

I was thinking more along the lines that four of the stories are all part of the same series, and two more stories are set in the same world (with one of the same characters in both stories). So that's already six stories whose groupings are predetermined out of a book of 15 stories.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

	From: sharonaf	Date: March 13th, 2008 06:09 pm (UTC)		(link)

Unlike your other commenters, I actually like the idea of a chronology. The combination of watching a writer develop as a writer and seeing what themes interested him when is a great draw to me. Especially if, as in this case, there will be afterwords discussing what was happening in the author's life as the time as well as how he wrote the story.
Just my two cents!
--Me

(Reply) (Thread)

	From: cogitationitis	Date: March 13th, 2008 08:12 pm (UTC)		(link)

When NESFA puts together a collection, it sometimes uses the rule:
1. Best Story First
2. Second Best Story Last
3. Rest in chronological or logical order (pub date or internal story date or group like stories)

(Reply) (Thread)

From: