 |
From: sethcohen |
Date: December 25th, 2007 07:23 pm (UTC) |
| (link) |
Re: Yes, I actually send email like this
|
Here was Joseph's reply to my email:
It had not occurred to me before, but has anyone else noticed that our McKesson robot could be viewed as"0-for-3" with respect to the Laws?
First Law:
A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. (The "inaction/come to harm" clause is key here; mysteriously missing doses, anyone?)
Second Law:
A robot must obey orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. (Self-explanatory, I think. The McKesson robot's frequent inability to "obey orders" for various reasons have been well documented)
Third Law:
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. (Downtime, crashes, lack of antivirus updating support, etc.)
Of course, as with any robot, the blame for failure to obey these laws can be placed squarely on the shoulders of the humans who programmed/built it (and perhaps a miniscule amount on those of us who work with it and maintain it), but I think it's interesting nonetheless.
Joseph
|