 |

 |
mabfan | |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Just last month, I began discussing issues of copyright and plagiarism. For those of you who are interested in revisiting those discussions, I've created a new tag: copyright. You may recall that in one of the posts I complained about Lehman High School's unlicensed production of Chicago. A student at the school replied anonymously, and one of the questions he asked was why I should care about what happens at their school. I gave an answer to his question, but in case he's still reading, someone else has come up with an even better answer. Friend and writer Adam-Troy Castro recently had to deal with a plagiarist who violated his copyright by posting an excerpt from his powerful story "The Juggler" on a vampire role-playing board, and represented it as his own work. When confronted, the malefactor removed the excerpt and apologized. But a few other people in the RPG complained that this wasn't so big a deal. So by invitation from one of the other RPG board participants, Adam wrote a response, laying out exactly why this was, in fact, a big deal. He's posted his response on his own newsgroup under the title Plagiarism Note, and I encourage any and all of you to go read it. The gist of it can be summed up in one sentence from the letter: "The fact is that plagiarism is a serious crime with serious consequences." And Adam explains exactly what those consequences can be, and how they not only hurt the victim, but damage the public good as well. Copyright © Michael BursteinTags: copyright, writing
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


 |
 |
|

 |
|

 |
|

 |
|

 |
|

 |
|

 |
|

 |
|

 |
|

 |
|

 |
|

 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
From: mabfan |
Date: June 29th, 2006 06:44 pm (UTC) |
| (link) |
|
Adam has asked me to forward this reply, with regards to the "hammer" comment: Excuse me.
The point is NOT that I have a big hammer.
(Though I don't mind allowing people to know that I do.) You can see that I was satisfied with an apology. I don't want to put myself through years of hell, as Harlan did.
The point is that the consequences are so dire that "Lucius" threatened doom to everything around him.
This is the situation. Let's say you WANT to go up to the big muscular guy at the end of the bar and call him a pussy. Who knows why. Maybe your significant other left you. Either way, you WANT to disturb his total stranger's evening that way, and you don't mind taking the consequences.
Well, that's you being an obnoxious idiot, but it's your decision. If a fight ensues, it's just you and him -- though you have also shown intense disregard for your fellow bar patrons, the feelings of a guy who has never done anything to hurt you, and the owners of the establishment.
The point is that if he invites you to take it outside, it's just you versus him.
Your idiocy doesn't rebound against anybody else.
So this, in the metaphor, would be a guy who prints up my novel, under his name, using his own printing press and his own distribution network, not involving any entities other than himself.
That's pretty rare. Most plagiarists are victimizing not only the author, but also their provided market -- either a publisher, or in this case, a community bulletin board.
Those plagiarists are asking others to share the responsibility for their crime.
So let's adjust the hypothetical.
Let's assume that you're drinking with friends and you go up to that same big muscular guy and you say, "Me and my friends, OVER THERE, think you're a big pussy."
That's something else.
In that case you are stupidly and inconsiderately requiring your friends to pay the price of your idiocy. THEY are going to share the cuts and bruises that YOU deserve.
In such a case you are being obnoxious to the big guy at the bar, the owner of the establishment, everybody who went there to have a peaceful drink, AND your friends.
If the end result of the fight that ensues is that the bar is closed down and NOBODY gets to drink there ever again, then you have done your friends and an innocent business harm.
Plagiarism is more than harmful to the author. It's dangerous to the plagiarist. AND to others.
I can only repeat: this Lucius defecated in somebody else's living room, during a family gathering. EVERYBODY there should be upset. Not just the guy whose shoes were defecated on.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
First off, I agree with everything Adam-Troy has put down in black and white. Coming from a journalism background, and working in a university setting, plagiarism is an issue that's been high on my radar screen for years, even before I was writing and selling fiction.
BUT...
I suspect his argument and carefully crafted points will be lost on this particular audience. They won't see any personal cost to the creator. Their reaction will be (and I'm almost willing to bet money on this one) more along the lines of "Yeah, but posting those stories was NO BIG DEAL. AOL was only hurt because Harlan OVERREACTED. The only way our boards, and by extension, us, will be hurt is if Adam-Troy is an ass and OVERREACTS."
I absolutely disagree with those sentiments, but such self-centered worldviews are all too common online and off. It's easy to blame such attitudes as "kids these days" but the easy access and anomymity the internet provides leads folks of all generations to embrace this sense of no-strings entitlement. I've seen it personally more times than I care to count. And if anyone steps in to interrupt this magical flow of manna from heaven, well, THAT person becomes the bad guy. Happens every time.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|  |
 |

|
 |
|